Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Lekvold

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1980No. 12852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Senior Justice.

Mary Lekvold Henderson’s suit against Gary Lekvold sought both arrears in child support payments and the enforcement of an escalating schedule of child support in accordance with the parties’ stipulated divorce decree. Lekvold’s motion to reduce his child support obligations was granted. Mrs. Henderson appeals. We reverse and remand.

We address the following issues:

1. whether Lekvold could rely on his excessive voluntarily-incurred financial obligations as a basis for reduction of his child support obligations;

2. whether the trial court properly considered the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gomez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Harris v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Petition of QuintanaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Diamond v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Grady v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Dillard v. DillardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API