Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lamb
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney William R. Lamb regarding Attorney Lamb's professional misconduct, in the handling of four client matters. The OLR and Attorney Lamb stipulate that Attorney Lamb committed professional misconduct in his handling of four client matters, and that Attorney Lamb's license to practice law in Wisconsin should be suspended for 60 days for his misconduct. In addition, the parties stipulate that Attorney Lamb shall pay restitution to one client, that he should be required to participate in continuing legal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArteryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
3Cited by8 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. RoitburdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. WinkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William R. LambWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. WinkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffery J. DrachWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.