Legal Opinion

Matter of King

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1990No. 19282PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This judicial disciplinary proceeding is before the Court pursuant to Rule III. D. of the West Virginia Rules of Procedure for the Handling of Complaints Against Justices, Judges, Magistrates and Family Law Masters. This proceeding was initiated by the Judicial Investigation Commission against family law master Wayne King. 1 The Commission charged family law master King with violation of Canon 2A, Canon 3A(1) and (5), and Canon 3B(1) of the Judicial Code of Ethics. 2 The West Virginia Judicial Hearing Board, after conducting a hearing on the matter, recommended to this Court that Wayne King…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of CrislipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re MarkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of AlvinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re TuckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. In Re LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. In Re SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API