Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bloom

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1978No. Crim. 77-383PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

The Court has before it a number of motions to suppress or dismiss this indictment of stock manipulation and mail fraud. Defendants Bernard Cronin and Robert Street have moved to suppress evidence and its fruits which was seized by their brokerage firm employer. Also, they wish to have testimony given by them to the Securities and Exchange Commission suppressed or the indictment dismissed due to government misconduct. Defendant Abraham Salaman has moved to suppress, and to dismiss the indictment, claiming that his statements to the SEC were “coerced” since…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary A. Edgmon and Jimmy W. EdgmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Raines v. Shoney's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  5. In Re Standard Financial Management Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API