Legal Opinion

Norfolk v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961No. 2968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Blume

Dean Norfolk, the appellant herein, was convicted on November 12, 1959, of reckless driving in violation of § 31-125, W.S. 1957, which reads as follows: “Any person who drives any vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving.” The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the testimony of the state, appellant moved for a directed verdict in his favor. This motion was denied. The appellant did not introduce any testimony. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, the appellant made a motion for judgment in his favor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hall v. MazzeiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. State v. NolanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PruettIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bartlett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. RideoutWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. LuntSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Kirbens v. Wyoming State Board of MedicineWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API