Stange v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Plaintiff in error, Otto Stange, was convicted and sentenced in the municipal court of Cleveland for the violation of an ordinance of the city of Cleveland providing for the enforcement of the eight-hour day on public work.
In the municipal court a demurrer was filed to the affidavit upon which the plaintiff in error was prosecuted. The demurrer was overruled. After the judgment in the municipal court was entered it was affirmed, in proceedings in error, by the court of common pleas and the court of appeals of Cuyahoga county. We are asked to reverse the judgments below.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Jaramillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. PetersOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Zanesville v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Emanuel v. Township of TwinsburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.