Legal Opinion
City of Zanesville v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.
TMs action originated in the Municipal Court of the city of Zanesville. Therein the defendant, Wesley Wilson, stood charged by affidavit with having violated the provisions of the following city ordinance:
“Section 10: It shall be unlawful for any person, persons, firm or corporation to operate, maintain, or conduct any barber shop or any place wherein barbering is done, in the City of Zanesville, Ohio, to be open for the business of barbering for revenue, pay, free or otherwise, before eight o’clock, a. m., and after six o’clock, p. m., on the following days, to-wit: Monday, Tuesday,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- State Ex Rel. Newman v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. ReveneUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- Feldman v. City of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
- Longley v. City of BedfordBedford Municipal Court · 1964