Legal Opinion
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 24, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-3222-ATPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge
This patent case presents the abstract question of whát is meant by the word “abstract.” Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“Mtel”) alleges that Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc, (“UPS”) infringed on Mtel’s patented method for “provid[ing] -prompt notification of delivery of an express mailing to the addressee thereof.” (Doe.1-1.) UPS filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 145] arguing that Mtel has attempted to impermissibly patent' the abstract idea of “notifying the recipient of an express mailing that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hawthorne v. Mac Adjustment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Electronic Communication v. shopperschoice.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Technology Development & Licensing, LLC v. General Instrument Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- All South Flooring, LLC v. Brett Ray PavelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
- Davis v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
- Erunta Kennedy v. Georgia Department of Corrections; Antoine Caldwell; Edginald Gibbons; Trendowski Scott; Daniel Greene; John Doe #1; and Johnson CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.