Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Tesar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
An award, in the sum of $3,731, was made against the employer and carrier for ninety per cent loss of use of the left hand. This award was paid.
The award here under review is against the employer alone and is for a like amount as “ increased compensation ” under section *33414-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (as added by Laws of 1923, chap. 572), which provides:
“ 1. Compensation and death benefits as provided in this article shall be double the amount otherwise payable if the injured employee at the time of the accident is a minor under eighteen years of age employed, permitted or suffered to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schumer v. CaplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People v. . RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Claim of Cross v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Hall v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Claim of Hall v. Chatham Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willis v. StoreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Bogartz v. AstorNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- In re Dearborn Mfg. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937
- Claim of Hemstreet v. Wilson Carpet Cleaning Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Claim of Kassoff v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.