Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bogartz v. Astor

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

This is a motion for' an order vacating a notice of lien filed by the Arcy Doll & Toy Manufacturing Company under section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Infant plaintiff was injured on September 27, 1941, while in the employ of the Arcy Doll Company, in a building in New York County owned by defendant Vincent Astor. He was only seventeen years of age at the time of his injury and made claim pursuant to section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law for double compensation. Thereafter, and on August 12, 1942, the Department of Labor, Division of Workmen’s Compensation, made an award…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People Ex Rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Wakefield v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Bristor v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Daly v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bogartz v. AstorNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Gerling v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bogartz v. AstorNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bogartz v. AstorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API