Legal Opinion
Weiner & Co. v. Teitelbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order entered March 7, 1984, Supreme Court, New York County (Irving Kirschenbaum, J.), granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint is reinstated, with costs.
Signed and unsigned writings relating to the same transaction and containing all the essential terms of a contract may be read together to evidence a binding contract (Crabtree v Arden Sales Corp., 305 NY 48). The sole issue presented to us is whether an unsigned, but dated, memorandum agreement plus two subsequent letters referring to that agreement, may be so read…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Elias v. SerotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Liberty Management & Construction Ltd. v. Fifth Avenue & Sixty-Sixth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ambrose Mar-Elia Co. v. DinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Asesores y Consejeros Aconsec CIA, S.A. v. Global Emerging Markets North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Dunlevy v. TinsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.