Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Sheen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 7, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On bill, &c., for injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

I ain satisfied that complainants are entitled to a preliminary-writ.

The adjudication of the building department of Atlantic City in condemning the building in question as unsafe is made the basis of the claim of right upon the part of defendant Sheen to destroy the building. That adjudication is manifestly void. It is neither in accordance with the ordinance under which it is made, nor in accordance with well established and fundamental rules of law. The condemnation ordinance contemplates that an unsafe building shall be repaired or torn down, unless the build*477ing inspector…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peters v. Township of HopewellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  2. City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. 106 North Walnut, LLC v. 106 North Walnut, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Rowland v. State Ex Rel. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Knight v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API