Juan's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
By a former decision in this case, 124 Maine, 123, it is decided that the earning capacity of the injured workman is to be computed under sub-clause (c), Paragraph IX., Section 1 of our Workmen’s Compensation Act, into which' is read, by necessary implication, the provison of increase of compensation arising from concurrent employment by two or more employers, expressed in sub-clause (a) of the same Paragraph, if concurrent employment is proved.
The ease is one where the workman, at the time of the accident, is serving more than one employer, his several employments being concurrent, at least…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Freeman v. Co-Hen Egg Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Maver v. Dwelling Managers Co.New York County Court, Essex County · 1960