Roland v. Newman

LEMERT, J

As to to the first grounds of error, plaintiff claims that the trial court committed error in refusing to charge plaintiff’s request number five, it being the contention of the defendant herein that if the court had charged plaintiff’s request number five, that the court would have virtually charged the jury that the defendant as a matter of law owed plaintiff no duty to use any care whatever as the automatic signal light was in his favor.

We note that the trial court in charging the jury charged request number one which is as follows:

“It was the duty of the driver of the taxicab,…