Tahiti Bar, Incorporated Liquor License Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
This is an appeal by Tahiti Bar, Incorporated, from an order of the court below dismissing an appeal by the licensee from an order of suspension entered by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. The court below found as a fact “that the entertainment in each instance- here was lewd, immoral or improper” and that “The entertainment in each of these cases was a predominant appeal to prurient interest.” The entertainment consisted of various dance routines described as “bumps and grinds” by female entertainers who had removed practically all of their clothing. Article IV of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Spankard's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tahiti Bar, Inc. Liquor License CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Tate Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Paxon Maymar, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Motta Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.