Legal Opinion

Olwell v. Skobis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Aepeal from a judgment of tbe superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. Tbis action was commenced August 6, 1902, against Frank Skobis, Joseph Skobis, and one Frederick Pabst to recover damages for tbe loss of an eye by reason of tbe alleged negligence of tbe defendants in tbe chipping of iron witb a cbisel in front of tbe office in wbicb tbe plaintiff was employed April 5, 1902, and wbicb occurred just after tbe plaintiff came out of tbe door of said office…

Read the full summary

Aepeal from a judgment of tbe superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge. Tbis action was commenced August 6, 1902, against Frank Skobis, Joseph Skobis, and one Frederick Pabst to recover damages for tbe loss of an eye by reason of tbe alleged negligence of tbe defendants in tbe chipping of iron witb a cbisel in front of tbe office in wbicb tbe plaintiff was employed April 5, 1902, and wbicb occurred just after tbe plaintiff came out of tbe door of said office on ber way to tbe public street. These defendants separately answered September 12, 1902, and tbe defendant Frederick…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

Eorty-two errors are assigned, and one of these has seven subdivisions. On the argument it seemed to be conceded that several of them, standing alone, were without merit. It has been held by a court of high authority that:

“When the assignments of error axe very numerous, it is practically found necessary to consider but a few of them.” Grayson v. Lynch, 163 U. S. 468, 16 Sup. Ct. 1064.

The rule of this court requires the brief of the appellant to state “the several errors relied upon for reversal.” Rule IX. This court should not be called upon to consider and determine exceptions not relied…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Grayson v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Maitland v. Gilbert Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Guinard v. Knapp-Stout & Co. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lyon v. City of Grand RapidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Anderson v. Chicago Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hamann v. Milwaukee Bridge Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rowley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wawrzyniakowski v. Hoffman & Billings Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API