Moore v. Niagara Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 324, Jan. T., 1900, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Noy. T., 1899, No. 47, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Charles Moore v. Niagara Fire Insurance Company of New York. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 324, Jan. T., 1900, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Noy. T., 1899, No. 47, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Charles Moore v. Niagara Fire Insurance Company of New York. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Endlich, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff subject to the following question reserved: The building in question having become vacant and unoccupied and having so remained for ten days and upwards immediately before the time of its destruction, the verdict must be for the defendant. Answer: Reserved and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Gordon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Hardiman v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- McKinney v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Addia v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Choy Look See v. Royal InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.