Legal Opinion
Milner v. Duncklee
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 8, 2006No. Civil Action 3:02cv1929 (SRU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
On September 30, 2002, the defendants arrested Steven Milner in his home. The arrest was made pursuant to a state court capias issued for failure to appear in a civil case. Milner subsequently filed a complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging principally that defendants violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
This ease raises the issue whether the capias 1 satisfies the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment. For the rea sons that follow, I conclude that it does…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Victor Keeylen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. KoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Waller v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Cole v. GonceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Cole v. GonceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.