Legal Opinion

Holt v. Ayers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1998No. C.A. No. 18744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant James Holt appeals the decision of the Akron Municipal Court dismissing his case for failure to prosecute. We reverse.

On January 24, 1997, appellant James Holt filed a complaint against appellees Luther Ayers and Michael Kinch in the Akron Municipal Court. Ayers filed a counterclaim with the court on February 12, 1997. On June 4, 1997, Holt amended his complaint, adding Sean Kinch as a defendant. The matter was set for trial on August 26, 1997. When neither Holt nor his attorney appeared in court on that date, Michael Kinch’s attorney moved the trial court to dismiss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Schreiner v. KarsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Ina v. George Fraam & Sons, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bushnell v. Mead ContainersOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. One Harley Davidson MotorcycleOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API