Legal Opinion

Lancey v. Brock

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scholfield

This was ejectment by appellee, against appellant. The land sued for is described in the declaration as being “the undivided one-fourth of that part of survey 117, in the common fields of Cahokia, which is bounded north-west by Tenth street, in the city of Bast St. Louis, north-east by the tract known as the ‘Ames tract,’ south-east by that part of said survey now occupied by Charles Gain, and south-west by survey 116 of said common fields. ” Appellee claimed title in fee simple. Upon the trial appellee read in evidence, to maintain the issue on his part, a deed dated December 13, 1854,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Crary v. . GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Burt v. PanjaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Busch v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. McClellan v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peters v. BalkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kotz v. BelzIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. NugentIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API