Legal Opinion

Walter B. Saner v. BridgeTex Pipeline Company, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided July 21, 2016No. 11-14-00199-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN M. BAILEY, JUSTICE

This is a condemnation case. Walter B. Saner owns a tract of land in Comanche County. BridgeTex Pipeline Company, LLC instituted condemnation proceedings to obtain an easement for a crude petroleum pipeline running across Saner’s land. The trial court found that BridgeTex’s proposed taking was for a common carrier pipeline, which is a statutorily permitted public use. In one issue, Saner asserts that the trial court erred when it found that the pipeline was for “public use” as,required by Article I, Section 17 of the Texas- constitution. 1 We affirm.

Background,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Harry M. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. PateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. and Mike Latta v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. the Crawford Family Farm Partnership v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L. P., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  5. Crosstex NGL Pipeline, L.P. v. Reins Road Farms-1, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API