Legal Opinion

Hartman v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 22, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Jefferson eireuit court holding an ordinance of the city of Louisville known .as the “wholesale fruit and vegetable ordinance” enacted on March 23, 1937, to be valid and constitutional. Under the ordinance “established dealers” as defined therein are required to pay a license fee of $100 per annum and each non-established dealer is required to pay a license fee of $250 per annum. Appellants, who come in the classification of non-established dealers are attacking it on the grounds that it is capricious,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Reynolds Metal Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Williams v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Martin, Comr. of Revenue v. Nocero Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Karnes v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Netter v. Scholtz, MayorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. George Wiedemann Brewing Co. v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
  4. City of Harrodsburg v. DevineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. Renfro Valley Folks, Inc. v. City of Mt. VernonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API