Bankson v. Anderson
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Upon the motion to -dismiss the complaint in this action it was determined that the three-year limitation provided by Section 49 of the Civil Practice Act of New York State was applicable to the cause of action alleged. D.C., 21 F.Supp. 67. As to plaintiff’s contention that the doctrine of laches is applicable rather than the statute of limitations, it need only be said that the action had its inception on the law side, Golden v. Cervenka, 278 Ill. 409, 116 N.E. 273, and its transfer to equity was to avoid a multiplicity of suits and to provide a proportionate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Dixon v. TalericoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Todd v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Hillmer v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.