Streitenberger v. Sheriff
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant duly and timely appeared in a magistrate’s court in Las Vegas for a scheduled preliminary examination. The prosecution did not subpoena a necessary witness and rested its case without having presented sufficient evidence to establish that appellant had probably committed the charged offense (leaving the scene of an accident, NRS 484.219).
The magistrate denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the *690charge and, sua sponte, gave the deputy district attorney a several hour continuance to come up with a “Hill” affidavit (Hill v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 234, 452 P.2d 918 (1969)), or to offer a…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Bustos v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Salas v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1975