Legal Opinion

Bustos v. Sheriff, Clark County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1971No. 6635PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an appeal from a district court denial of habeas corpus. The petition for discharge from restraint alleged that the justice of the peace illegally granted a continuance of a scheduled preliminary examination in that he failed to honor the directive of Hill v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 234, 452 P.2d 918 (1969). In that case we ruled that the “reasons underlying DCR 21 are equally appropriate to the continuance of a criminal proceeding in the justices’ court” and that statutory “good cause” for continuance [NRS 171.196(2)] contemplates that the party seeking a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Maes v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. AustinNevada Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Browning v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McNair v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Grant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Sheriff, Washoe County v. MarcusNevada Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API