Legal Opinion

United States v. Higgs

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 4, 2007No. 06-3738PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

This court has an obligation to inquire sua sponte into its own jurisdiction and, necessarily, into the jurisdiction of the District Court to enter the order on appeal. In the case before us, defendant Charles Higgs appeals from the order of the District Court denying his motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the reasons set forth below in some detail, we conclude that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order.

I

On October 29, 2004, Higgs waived indictment and pled guilty to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. McGaughyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API