Legal Opinion

Viken Detection Corp. v. Videray Techs. Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 14, 2019No. Civil Action No. 19-10614-NMGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge

Viken Detection Corporation ("Viken" or "plaintiff") filed a complaint against Videray Technologies Inc. ("Videray") and its founder and president, Paul Bradshaw ("Bradshaw") (collectively "defendants"), alleging that Bradshaw misappropriated confidential information of Viken when he left the company to form Videray and to produce and market a competing product using that information. Viken asserts that defendants' conduct constitutes a violation of 1) the Defend Trade Secrets Act ("the DTSA"), 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)(1), and 2) the Computer Fraud…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Voice of the Arab World, Inc. v. MDTV Medical News Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Bulwer v. Mount Auburn HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Mary Z. Asseo, Etc. v. Pan American Grain Company, Inc., and Pan American Grain Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. FougereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. FougereDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  3. BioPoint, Inc.. v. AttisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  4. Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC v. BelesimoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. DraftKings Inc. v. HermalynDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API