Casey v. Goulian
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs bring state-law nuisance claims, alleging that defendants are involved in noisy and dangerous stunt-airplane flights over their homes. Defendants removed this suit from state court on the ground that plaintiffs’ claims fall within this Court’s federal-question jurisdiction. The Court holds it lacks jurisdiction over this suit, and ALLOWS plaintiffs’ motion for remand.
DISCUSSION
I. Standard for Removal
A party seeking to remove a case to federal court has the burden of demonstrating the existence of federal jurisdiction. See, e.g.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.