Legal Opinion

Casey v. Goulian

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 21, 2003No. CIV.A.03-11042-PBSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs bring state-law nuisance claims, alleging that defendants are involved in noisy and dangerous stunt-airplane flights over their homes. Defendants removed this suit from state court on the ground that plaintiffs’ claims fall within this Court’s federal-question jurisdiction. The Court holds it lacks jurisdiction over this suit, and ALLOWS plaintiffs’ motion for remand.

DISCUSSION

I. Standard for Removal

A party seeking to remove a case to federal court has the burden of demonstrating the existence of federal jurisdiction. See, e.g.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API