Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Stearns

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 7, 1977No. 49-77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment order of the Windsor Superior Court in which it was determined that the defendants were liable as co-makers on a certain promissory note acquired by the plaintiff via a rather involved series of transactions. The defendants have filed their appeal from this judgment. In addition, the plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal, alleging that the amount of money found by the trial court to be owed on the note is clearly erroneous.

The defendant Bruce Stearns and one G. E. Smith were partners in a construction business. In the course of its business, the partnership…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Freccia v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. First National Bank of Fairbanks v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lamson v. Commercial Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Dameris v. Homestead BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Randolph National Bank v. VailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Licursi v. SweeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Little v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API