Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AQUILINO, Senior Judge.
By letter dated November 23, 2004, counsel for the plaintiff seek to supplement their motion for judgment upon the administrative record compiled by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) sub nom. Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 67 Fed.Reg. 46,-172 (July 12, 2002). In addition to contesting various elements of that agency determination, plaintiffs motion represents that “many” 1 or “almost all” 2 entries within the determination’s purview have already been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Tianjin MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Trustees in Bankruptcy of North American Rubber Thread Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Almond Bros. Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.