Phillips v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

WILLSON, C. J,

(after stating the facts as above). Appellant insists that the findings of the jury, showing appellee and its employés not to have been guilty of negligence which was a proximate cáuse -Of the accident resulting in injury to him, were against the “overwhelming weight of the testimony.” We have read and considered all the testimony in the statement of facts sent to this court, and do not agree with appellant in his view of it. It would serve no useful purpose to set out and discuss the testimony. Therefore we only say that, as we understand it, it furnished support for each of…