Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Barton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The suit is for disability benefits as provided in a policy of life insurance issued by appellant to appellee.
The several counts allege the existence of the provision for disability benefits. Count 1 does not undertake to set out in full the terms of the provision, and does not allege that proof of such disability is thereby required, but alleges that satisfactory proof was made while the insurance was in full force, and also that notice was given. Count 2 quoted the terms of the policy in part as follows: “If such member, while younger than sixty years of age, and while the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SinquefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. BartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Robert Joely White v. Community Bancshares of Mississippi Inc., David M. Hughes and Community Bank CoastCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021