Duncan v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Luther M. Duncan, brings this action against the Montgomery Ward *5& Company, for personal injuries which he alleges he received while in their employ, through the negligence of a fellow servant. There was a trial to a jury and a verdict for the plaintiff. Within apt time the defendant filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and for a new trial in the alternative. The motion was argued orally to the Court and counsel for both parties have submitted well prepared briefs.
The question for consideration in this case is whether or not there is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry., J. M. Kurn, Trus. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Renati v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019