Craftsman Builder's Supply, Inc. v. Butler Manufacturing Co.

¶ 32 I concur with Justice Russon’s carefully and correctly reasoned majority opinion. I write not because I believe it necessary to add anything thereto, but rather to respond *1204to Justice Zimmerman’s lone concurrence in which he attacks long-standing Utah case law construing Article I, section 11 of the Utah Constitution, the so-called open courts provision.1 Justice Zimmerman aims much of his attack at Berry v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 717 P.2d 670 (Utah 1985); however, the attack on Berry serves as a guise to nullify this Court’s Article I, section 11 jurisprudence and, more importantly, the…