Legal Opinion

Gullo v. Village of Lindenhurst

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFred J. Munder, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Lindenhurst to be unconstitutional and void, as arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable and confiscatory in its application to a single plot owned by the plaintiff.

The subject property consists of two lots, each 25 feet by 100 feet, located on the westerly side of Travis Street. Abutting *762this 50-foot plot on the south is a plot 100 feet by 100 feet which plaintiff has owned for many years and on which plaintiff has conducted a garage and automobile body and fender repair shop as a nonconforming use. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AltmanNew York District Court · 1969
  2. Town of Huntington v. SchwartzSuffolk County District Court · 1970
  3. Stevens v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. BerlinNassau County District Court · 1970
  5. Gullo v. Village of LindenhurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API