Legal Opinion

Plummer v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Fannin County. Tried below before Hon. Ben. H. Denton.

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Associate Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title to 83 acres of land situated on the south side of and adjacent to Eed Eiver in Eannin County. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the suit the defendants have appealed. The sufficiency of the petition in describing the land sued for is attacked in a general demurrer. It is contended that the field-notes call for only one object, either natural or artificial, and that object is Eed Eiver. The field-notes call for two corners of the Cox survey, and from its FT. W. corner to run at a definite variation to Eed Eiver.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Rice v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Durst v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Crabtree v. WhiteselleTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Denny v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. Sexton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Sharp v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Shapleigh v. United Farms Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Universal Home Builders, Inc. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API