Legal Opinion

King v. Powell.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ActioN by J. G. King against A. M. Powell and another, to enforce a judgment lien against certain land, beard by Judge II. R. Siarbuch, at March Term, 1900, of Warken Superior Court. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to tbe complaint, tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFaircloth, C. J.

The plaintiff had a docketed judgment against W. W. Powell, who conveyed his tract of land to A. M. Powell and John Powell after said judgment was docketed. The plaintiff institutes this action for an order to sell said land to satisfy said judgment. The defendants demur to the complaint on the ground that it appears therein that the plaintiff’s lien had expired and was lost by the lapse of time. The demurrer was sustained, his Honor bolding that the complaint stated no cause of action against the defendants. The plaintiff excepted, and appealed.

We express no opinion on tbe point decided by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. . the North Carolina Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Guthrie v. . BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Bacon v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Kahnweiler v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Iredell County v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API