Legal Opinion
Boily v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1995No. C3-94-2447PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHYLLIS G. JONES, Judge. *
Relator challenges the Commissioner’s determination that dentists performing services in relator’s clinic are employees rather than independent contractors.
FACTS
Relator James Boily, D.D.S. owns and operates the Afton Road Dental Clinic. Boily contracts with three dentists for their services at the clinic. Boily’s contracts with the dentists provide that the dentists are independent contractors. The dentists are not required to work a particular number of hours and set their own schedules. They have complete independence in determining the course of treatment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hough Transit, Ltd. v. HarigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Lakeland Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. EngleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Blue & White Taxi v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boily v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Elizabeth Placzek v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Moore Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996