Blue & White Taxi v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Relator Blue and White Taxi argues that the finding by the representative of the Commissioner of Jobs and Training of an employment relationship, rather than independent contractor status, between respondent Carlson and the taxi company is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Other than the employment relationship issue, the facts of this case are largely undisputed.
Respondent David Carlson signed a one-year “lease agreement” on May 21, 1991, with relator Blue and White Taxi (cab company), a subsidiary of Mid City Transit, a Minnesota…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Kileen & GillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lakeland Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. EngleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Rochester Dairy Co. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- North Face Exteriors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Boily v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996