Legal Opinion

Blue & White Taxi v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1993No. C3-92-1584PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Relator Blue and White Taxi argues that the finding by the representative of the Commissioner of Jobs and Training of an employment relationship, rather than independent contractor status, between respondent Carlson and the taxi company is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Other than the employment relationship issue, the facts of this case are largely undisputed.

Respondent David Carlson signed a one-year “lease agreement” on May 21, 1991, with relator Blue and White Taxi (cab company), a subsidiary of Mid City Transit, a Minnesota…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kileen & GillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Lakeland Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. EngleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Rochester Dairy Co. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. North Face Exteriors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Boily v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API