Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. Gruner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1948No. 4-8425PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On December 27, 1941, appellant Bridwell executed to appellee Gruner a warranty deed describing 760 acres of land. Among other lands described was the NE}4 of the SW1^ of Sec. 15, T. 11 N., it. 9 W. and the SW^ of the SW% of the same section.

This suit was brought by Gruner against Bridwell to recover damages for the breach of the covenant of warranty of the title to the land; to recover certain taxes which he had been required to pay, which were delinquent when the deed was delivered; and to recover certain attorneys’ fees which he had paid in defending the title to the land. From the decree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collier v. CowgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. Smith v. Boynton Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Vandergrift v. LowerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Bridwell v. RackleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Fels v. EzellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. HaasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  2. Gaede v. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. Turner v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Steven A. Gaede And Ruth A. Gaede Vs. Leslie D. Stansberry And Margery J. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API