Legal Opinion

Bitner v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 1963No. 20,344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

Bitner seeks review of an order of the Denver district court denying a writ of habeas corpus. We shall refer to him as petitioner.

It appears that petitioner was charged and pled guilty to two separate informations, one charging simple robbery and the other robbery. He received concurrent but separate sentences of not less than five nor more than fourteen years on two separate dates. Both trial courts considered a probation report before them at the time of sentencing. At both hearings petitioner waived his right to a hearing of evidence in mitigation of the offenses. These waivers were given…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  2. Arrano v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. Little v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Valentine v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bizup v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API