Legal Opinion

Groenland v. Phœnix Sprinkler & Heating Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff had in his dairy a home-made milk-cooling device. Defendant solicited him to purchase its cooling machine, and he did so under a conditional sales contract containing a guaranty:

“We guarantee this model 150 Lipman Machine Full Automatic Refrigerating Machine to 'be of sufficient capacity to maintain temperatures as follows: 35 degrees Fh. in the milk cooler box and to cool water in tank to 35 degrees Fh.”

The machine was installed about July 1, 1924, did not meet the guaranty, was replaced by a larger one and efforts made and money expended by plaintiff to make it work, but,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moneyweight Scale Co. v. DavidMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Hill-Diesel Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Cincinnati Rubber Mfg. Co. v. John T. Towsley Mfg. Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API