Legal Opinion

Burnham-Munger-Root Dry Goods Co. v. Strahl

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1918No. 19857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Pierce county: Andrew R. Oleson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLkxton, J.

This was an action for the recovery of money. A writ of attachment was issued and levied upon a stock of goods belonging to defendant. A few days after-wards defendant executed a bond with sureties, in which they “do hereby undertake to plaintiff in the sum of $5,177.54 that the defendant shall perform the judgment of the court in this action and pay the judgment and costs rendered against him.” Afterwards defendant moved to dissolve the attachment on the ground that the affidavit was insufficient and that it was false and untrue. Plaintiff then moved to strike this motion from the files upon…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moffitt v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Dewey v. KavanaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barth v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Barkley v. PoolNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ravely v. IsenseeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API