Scott v. Adal Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, Senior Judge:
This appeal and cross-appeal comes to us from an Order entered July 2, 1984 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting appellant Scott’s Motion for Summary Judgment in part, holding that the notice requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure for sheriff’s sales of real property did not comport with due process, but denying the motion in all other respects.
This action was commenced by a class action complaint in equity filed in April, 1976, by the Scotts on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The complaint was filed against the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Revis v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Revis v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Blue Ball National Bank v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. Campstead, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.