Legal Opinion

A.C. Davenport & Son Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 25, 1983No. 82-2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether the General Services Administration (GSA), having mistakenly made duplicate payments to both the contractor and subcontractor under a government contract, may recover the overpayments from the subcontractor. The district court held that it may not. We affirm.

The GSA originally contracted with Al-mark, Inc. for bulletin boards. Almark then subcontracted with Davenport to manufacture these bulletin boards. Because of Almark’s financial instability Davenport agreed to accept the subcontract only if Almark guaranteed payment. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. C. Davenport & Son Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rainey v. International Harvester Credit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Goad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
  4. R & L Refunds, Inc. v. United States (In Re R & L Refunds, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1988
  5. Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Sam Levy, Individually and Doing Business as Sam's Gem Trading, Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Sam Levy, Individually and Doing Business as Sam's Gem Trading, Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Bogharian Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API