Legal Opinion

Read v. Citizens' Street Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sbelby County. — ■ P. H. Hbiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The questions presented upon the record relate, first, to the right of a trustee to compensation, including reasonable counsel fees, and, second, the right of ownership in a certain surplus arising under the administration of a trust — whether it goes to defendant street railroad *320company or to the original stockholders in its predecessor companies. The facts necessary to be stated are that in 1886 two rival street railroad companies were being operated in the city of Memphis, one known as the Memphis City Railroad Company and the other the Citizens’ Street Railroad Company. A consolidation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turley v. TurleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Duluth National Bank v. Knoxville Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brier Hill Collieries v. PileCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  2. Goodman v. PalmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API