Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Siglin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Coos County. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By tbe Court,

Lord, C. J.:

To properly understand tbe question in controversy, it is sufficient to state that it appears from tbe transcript tbat *94while the appellant was county cleric of Ooos county, one J. D. Fry obtained a judgment in the circuit court of that county for a large sum of money, against Tom Utter et al., upon which execution was issued and real property sold to the amount of $41,000. The respondent, as the agent and attorney of said Fry, bid off the premises at this sum, but no money was paid to the sheriff except his fees, the credit being endorsed on said execution,' and thus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. Preston v. BaconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  3. American Exchange Fire Insurance v. BrittonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861
  4. Churchill v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. State v. MerrittTennessee Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mackenzie v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Baker County v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pugh v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Houser v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Wallowa County v. OakesOregon Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API