Legal Opinion

United States v. Humberto Baron-Mantilla

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 9, 1984No. 83-5436PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Humberto Baron-Mantilla, appeals his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1982) for knowingly and intentionally possessing with the intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine. The issue is whether the district court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress the introduction of three kilograms of cocaine into evidence.

Background

On February 2, 1983, at approximately 8:45 p.m., while working in an undercover capacity, DEA Special Agent Alberto Fernandez was introduced to appellant Humberto Baron-Mantilla by a confidential informant. The meeting took place in front of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BachnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Oscar Torres, Daniel Narvaez, and Javier Dario GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. LevesonSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. United States v. RackleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Robert Irving Eyster, A/K/A Bobby, Jack Leroy MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Robert Lee AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API