Cookson v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
SILVER, J.,
with whom JABAR, J., joins, dissenting.
[¶20] I respectfully dissent. The insurance policy covers motor vehicles and motorized land conveyances that are (1) not subject to motor vehicle registration and (2) used to service a residence. The phrase “subject to motor vehicle registration” is not ambiguous, and Cookson’s Case 590M is not the type of vehicle that is subject to motor vehicle registration. The phrase “service an insured’s residence,” however, is ambiguous and should be construed in favor of Cookson. Taken together, these provisions indicate that the Case 590M falls within…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jipson v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Peerless Insurance Co. v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Kimball v. New England Guaranty Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- N.A. Burkitt, Inc. v. Champion Road MacHinery Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000