Legal Opinion

Carr v. Prader

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 9, 1999No. 98-170-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Chief Justice.

This ease comes to the Court as a certified question from the Superior Court in accordance with G.L.1956 § 9-24-27. The Superi- or Court asks us to consider for the first time whether the municipal probate courts possess the jurisdiction to entertain a guardianship petition opposed by a minor child’s surviving parent.

The essential facts of this case are undisputed. Heidi and Timothy (Carr) wed on September 23, 1989, and had a tempestuous marriage, characterized by several separations. The union produced two sons, Jonathan Kyle Carr (Jonathan), born on March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  3. In Re Kimberly and JamesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. In Re JonathanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Petition of LoudinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. In the Matter of Guardianship of MeoWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Ogden Ex Rel. Rath-Roth v. RathSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. D.K.S. v. C.S.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API